Flint

Flint enters a crowded market of AI tools pitched toward teachers and students.  However, it offers some compelling features and detailed transparency of how it stands out.  In particular, Flint is one of a handful of AI tools that is GDPR and COPPA-compliant, and FERPA-aligned.  That means that Flint can potentially be used by students under 13.  

While Flint can definitely make teaching easier, it clearly believes not only in the importance of students using AI, but doing so in a non-passive, critical way.

Flint argues how they are different than other AI tools.

Flint does not get pulled off topic, nor does it lower the cognitive work of your students  -- although this is adjustable (see below).

Let's dig into Flint and see what learning campfires we can kindle!

How does it work?

As shared on its website, "Flint is powered by Claude 3.7 Sonnet."  Flint also offers a point-by-point comparision between itself and other AI tools such as ChatGPT,  Toddle, Brisk, Khanmigo, SchoolAI, and MagicSchoolAI.

A teacher can sign up with Google or their Microsoft account.  (Student spaces and "accounts" are handled inside the teacher account -- they don't need to create separate accounts.)

Once logged in, Flint offers itself as your "AI Teaching Assistant."  For the upper section of the home screen, it suggests several ways it can help your instruction, such as lowering the reading level of a text, creating a lesson plan or rubric, and writing an email.  In the lower section, you can create an activity published to an online space made accessible to students by a URL.  Teachers can also save time by using an activity from a public library of pre-made content. 

"Activities" are broadly defined here.  It could be "problem solving practice," "speak a world language" (50+ are available!), provide writing feedback, or create a "quiz."  Here, however, is an example of Flint using an antiquated term of expectations when compared to what students would really experience.

A quiz in Flint is really a conversation between the student and the AI.  Once you give it objectives, potential material to utilize via uploads, and/or standards, Flint begins an assessment by probing what students know, coaxing them when they struggle.  The results of this or any other activity are provided as "Analytics" that look at both how the class did overall as well as an individual's strengths and areas for growth.

Building an activity is a conversation between teacher and Flint.  Here, I asked if I could upload a standards-based rubric to make a quiz.

You could also just provide the standard you are wanting to assess.

Safety seems essential to Flint, given several different features it has to protect students.  Student and teacher data is not shared to third parties and data is not used to train AI models; the data stays secure in the school/district's domain.  Additionally, you can export any student-AI conversation to PDF, inappropriate messages are flagged, and every user exchange can be viewed by admin.  

Educators can make Flint "more or less flexible" with how it helps students.

Flint offers a depth of support for new users, from professional development resources to an onboarding guide for teachers.  They even have an AI Literacy Course for students, which includes lesson materials such as videos, slide decks, and Flint activities you can push out.

Here is Flint's most recent overview video on the platform posted on Loom (1:43).

How could you use it?

Flint offers specific, targeted opportunities for both instructional design and student demonstration of understanding.  Its offerings of World Language activities is unique.  Flint provides students a first tier of tutoring support, particularly with its integration of a whiteboard that could improve math practice and review.  A quiz's use of naturalistic language changes the game for what it means for a teacher to assess.   Last but not least, Flint's ability to discover class data trends as well as drill down to individual student performance makes the potential action pivot from assessment analysis to adjusted instruction much quicker and easier.

Downsides?

One must always be cautious with the accuracy and veracity of artificial intelligence tools, as well as verifiable impact on student learning.  To Flint's credit, they mention several times in their list of features their efforts to be as accurate and transparent as possible, and they share several detailed case studies of partnerships with schools where student learning has improved.

"In-line citations" is one of several ways Flint attempts transparency in its AI results.

Elementary teachers will likely be just fine with the limit of 80 students in the free account, although secondary teachers may rightfully fret.  However, secondary instructors can delete and reassign the seats every few periods to get through a typical day, sacrificing historic data for extending the free usage.  That would hopefully give enough of an opportunity for a teacher to try out Flint to see if a premium account would be worth it.

Flint is not the only tool to promote itself as "AI for personalized learning," but its suite of features make it a contender for honoring that vaulted claim.  Come to it as a skeptic and see if it sparks some innovation for your instruction.

Have you used Flint?  If you are a heavy user of another AI platform, how does Flint compare?  Comment below!

Full disclosure: Flint is in talks with my employer OVEC for potential offers and opportunities for its members.